-
Supported By:
Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Weekly Roundup: October 14, 2016–October 20, 2016
The Virtuous Corporation Posted by Shlomit Azgad-Tromer, Columbia Law School, on Friday, October 14, 2016 Tags: Benefit corporation, Compliance & ethics, Corporate culture, Corporate Social Responsibility, Engagement, Firm performance, Incentives, Management, Reputation, Social capital, Stakeholders, Sustainability Proposed Canada Business Corporations Act Amendments: A New Era? Posted by Louis-Martin O’Neill and Jennifer Longhurst, Davies Ward Phillips […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Weekly Roundup
Tagged Weekly Roundup
Comments Off on Weekly Roundup: October 14, 2016–October 20, 2016
Voting Standards Are Not that Standard
As we enter the homestretch of the presidential election and the quadrennial bewilderment at the vagaries of the Electoral College system, it is an opportune moment to highlight that the voting standards for corporate shareholder approvals in the United States can be similarly confounding. The simple question of whether shareholder approval was obtained or a director […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Corporate Elections & Voting, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Boards of Directors, Charter & bylaws, Delaware law, Disclosure, Incorporations, Jurisdiction, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC, Securities regulation, Shareholder elections, Shareholder voting, State law
Comments Off on Voting Standards Are Not that Standard
Selling Hope, Selling Risk
Most existing work in the fields of corporate governance and investor protection assumes that corporate managers (and bankers, analysts, brokers and the like) are smart—and selfish—utility maximizers, while many investors are not. That follows naturally from the assumption that the former got to where they are via success in competitive crucibles that reward rationality, and […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Securities Litigation & Enforcement, Securities Regulation
Tagged Behavioral finance, Compliance & ethics, Disclosure, Diversity, Information environment, Insider trading, Investor protection, Market efficiency, Misconduct, Overconfidence, Securities regulation
Comments Off on Selling Hope, Selling Risk
It Pays to Set the Menu: Mutual Fund Investment Options in 401(k) Plans
401(k) plans have experienced significant growth in recent years, gradually replacing other pension arrangements. Many participants in these plans have no financial investments other than their retirement savings. Therefore, an important economic issue emerging from the growth of defined contributions is whether current employees can accumulate sufficient wealth for retirement in their 401(k) accounts. As […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research
Tagged 401(k), Conflicts of interest, ERISA, Fiduciary duties, Form 11-K, Fund managers, Fund performance, Incentives, Investor protection, Mutual funds, Pension funds, Retirement plans
Comments Off on It Pays to Set the Menu: Mutual Fund Investment Options in 401(k) Plans
Navigating A New Management-Board Relationship
These can be difficult days for anyone in management who frequently deals with the company’s board of directors. That once-comfortable relationship between management and the board, particularly in public companies, is being strained by unprecedented change. It often plays out in ways that can feel intrusive and irritating—requests for more data, reports, presentations and meetings—all […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board communication, Board composition, Board dynamics, Boards of Directors, Director qualifications, Diversity, Engagement, Executive turnover, Management, Oversight, Shareholder activism, Succession
Comments Off on Navigating A New Management-Board Relationship
The Fed’s Commodities Proposal: Safety and Soundness Regulation or Indirect Prohibition?
On September 23, 2016, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) issued its long-expected proposed rule (Proposed Rule) relating to permissible financial holding company (FHC) commodities activities. The Proposed Rule follows up on the Section 620 Study (Study) issued by the U.S. federal banking regulators two weeks earlier, in which the […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Banking & Financial Institutions, Derivatives, Financial Regulation, Practitioner Publications, Securities Regulation
Tagged Banks, Broker-dealers, Commodities, Derivatives, Disclosure, Federal Reserve, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Reporting regulation, Risk, Securities regulation, Systemic risk
Comments Off on The Fed’s Commodities Proposal: Safety and Soundness Regulation or Indirect Prohibition?
Institutional Investor Cliques and Governance
Do institutional investors work together to influence firm policies and governance? Researchers often think of owners as independent actors. This leads to the common view that dispersed ownership will result in poorer governance, all else equal, because small owners will not have the incentive to monitor individually (the “free rider” problem). However, in recent years it has become widely acknowledged […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Corporate Elections & Voting, Empirical Research, Institutional Investors
Tagged Information environment, Institutional Investors, Ownership structure, Proxy voting, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting, Social networks
Comments Off on Institutional Investor Cliques and Governance
Delaware Court’s Reliance on MFW to Dismiss Challenge to Going Private Transaction
In a recent decision, Vice Chancellor Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery clarified certain issues related to the obligations of a controlling stockholder that often arise in connection with going private and similar transactions. The case involved a relatively conventional proposal by a controlling stockholder (the Anderson family) to acquire the remaining shares of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Board independence, Boards of Directors, Business judgment rule, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Fiduciary duties, Going private, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Minority shareholders, Offer pricing, Shareholder suits
Comments Off on Delaware Court’s Reliance on MFW to Dismiss Challenge to Going Private Transaction
Private Tech Growth as an Asset Class
Though everyone in the venture community is cognizant of the growth in the number and size of mega-private financings (i.e., $100MM+), we wanted to present our clients with a much clearer understanding of the trend and how it is impacting the capital markets for emerging growth technology companies. To do that, we analyzed literally thousands […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Practitioner Publications, Private Equity
Tagged Capital formation, Firm valuation, IPOs, Private equity, Private firms, Tech companies, Venture capital firms
Comments Off on Private Tech Growth as an Asset Class
Tournament Incentives and Firm Innovation
A growing sentiment following the recent financial crisis is that CEOs are overpaid and that their large compensation dilutes shareholder value. This sentiment is partly rooted in the fact that the pay disparity between CEOs and other employees has rapidly grown over the last three decades. Recent evidence shows that non-CEO executives on average earn […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, Empirical Research, Executive Compensation
Tagged Compensation disclosure, Compensation ratios, Executive Compensation, Executive performance, Firm performance, Incentives, Innovation, Management, Patents, R&D, Reporting regulation, Risk-taking, Shareholder value
Comments Off on Tournament Incentives and Firm Innovation