-
Supported By:


Subscribe or Follow
HLS Faculty & Senior Fellows
Program on Corporate Governance Advisory Board
- Peter Atkins
- David Bell
- Kerry E. Berchem
- Richard Brand
- Daniel Burch
- Paul Choi
- Jesse Cohn
- Arthur B. Crozier
- Renata J. Ferrari
- Andrew Freedman
- Ray Garcia
- Joseph Hall
- Jason M. Halper William P. Mills
- David Millstone
- Theodore Mirvis
- Philip Richter
- Elina Tetelbaum
- Sebastian Tiller
- Marc Trevino
- Steven J. Williams
Author Archives: Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation
Estimating the Compliance Costs of Sarbox Section 404(B)
An extensive literature across law, accounting, economics and finance has analyzed the compliance costs of securities regulation. In the US context, the Sarbanes-Oxley (hereafter SOX) legislation enacted in 2002 has been a particular focus of attention. However, its social welfare consequences remain controversial. My new working paper on Estimating the Compliance Costs of Securities Regulation: […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Accounting & Disclosure, Empirical Research, Securities Regulation
Tagged Compliance & ethics, Financial reporting, Private benefits of control, Public float, Reporting regulation, Securities regulation, SOX, SOX Section 404
Comments Off on Estimating the Compliance Costs of Sarbox Section 404(B)
Optimizing Board Evaluations
The effectiveness of a company’s board of directors is critical for ensuring that the company has a sound and long-term business strategy that is executed within an environment of prudent risk management. Board effectiveness contributes to the sustainability of the corporation over the long term and is therefore of vital importance to stockholders and other […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Accounting & Disclosure, Boards of Directors, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Board communication, Board dynamics, Board evaluation, Board independence, Board monitoring, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Oversight
Comments Off on Optimizing Board Evaluations
CEO Personality and Firm Policies
In the paper, CEO Personality and Firm Policies, which was recently made publicly available on SSRN, we use two samples of high quality personality data for chief executive officers (CEOs) and the way they speak during question-and-answer (Q&A) portion of earnings conference calls to develop a measure of CEO personality in terms of the Big Five […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Empirical Research
Tagged Behavioral finance, Capital allocation, Executive performance, Executive value, Firm performance, Management, Managerial style, R&D, Risk-taking
Comments Off on CEO Personality and Firm Policies
Securities Class Action Filings: 2016 Midyear Assessment
Plaintiffs filed 119 new federal securities class action cases in the first half of 2016, a 17 percent increase over the last half of 2015, according to Securities Class Action Filings—2016 Midyear Assessment, a new report released by Cornerstone Research and the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. The total represents an increase of […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Mergers & Acquisitions, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Class actions, Filings, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Section 11, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Supreme Court, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Securities Class Action Filings: 2016 Midyear Assessment
The Law and Brexit III
August has arrived and, with it, little additional clarity on next steps in the Brexit process. Speculation remains rife about the objectives of the UK Government in the negotiations. Will it seek access to the single market, will it pursue a clean break from the EU, or will a hybrid engagement model emerge? What has […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Banking & Financial Institutions, Executive Compensation, Financial Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Bailouts, Banker bonuses, Banks, Bonuses, Brexit, Capital requirements, EU, Europe, Executive Compensation, Failed banks, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, Foreign banks, G-SIB, Recovery & resolution plans, UK
Comments Off on The Law and Brexit III
The Lifecycle of Firm Takeover Defenses
Are takeover defenses good or bad for shareholders? The answer depends on whom you ask. Many researchers find support for the view that takeover defenses entrench managers and decrease firm value (e.g., Gompers, Ishii and Metrick (2003), Masulis, Wang, and Xie (2007), Bebchuk, Cohen and Ferrell (2009)). But others find that takeover defenses are associated […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Boards of Directors, Empirical Research, Mergers & Acquisitions
Tagged Acquisitions, Agency costs, Antitakeover, Boards of Directors, Entrenchment, Firm valuation, Hostile takeover, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Poison pills, Shareholder value, Takeover defenses, Takeovers
Comments Off on The Lifecycle of Firm Takeover Defenses
Do Creditor Rights Increase Employment Risk? Evidence from Loan Covenants
In our article, Do Creditor Rights Increase Employment Risk? Evidence from Loan Covenants, which was recently accepted for publication in the Journal of Finance, we provide evidence that binding financial contracts have a large impact on employees and are an amplification mechanism of economic downturns. A fundamental question in both finance and macroeconomics is whether […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Academic Research, Bankruptcy & Financial Distress, Empirical Research, Financial Crisis
Tagged Bankruptcy, Capital formation, Capital markets, Cost of capital, Covenants, Debt, Debt contracts, Debtor-creditor law, Defaults, Distressed companies, Employees, Financial crisis, Labor markets, Market conditions
Comments Off on Do Creditor Rights Increase Employment Risk? Evidence from Loan Covenants
Corporate Culture and the Role of Boards
The FRC’s mission is to promote high quality corporate governance and reporting to foster investment. The UK has a good reputation in this field which has underpinned a substantial amount of business success, but it is by no means perfect. There are valid questions about how effectively existing corporate governance arrangements address the board’s responsibilities […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Boards of Directors, Comparative Corporate Governance & Regulation, International Corporate Governance & Regulation, Practitioner Publications
Tagged Accountability, Board communication, Board leadership, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Director qualifications, Engagement, International governance, Long-Term value, Management, Reputation, UK
Comments Off on Corporate Culture and the Role of Boards
Stakes Go Up In SEC Administrative Proceedings
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit [on August 9, 2016] upheld the constitutionality of SEC administrative proceedings in Raymond J. Lucia Cos. v. Securities and Exchange Commission . This is a significant victory for the SEC. In recent years, the SEC has brought increasing numbers of enforcement actions as administrative proceedings, rather than […]
Click here to read the complete post
Posted in Court Cases, Practitioner Publications, Securities Litigation & Enforcement
Tagged Forum selection, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Jurisdiction, Misconduct, SEC, SEC enforcement, Securities enforcement, U.S. federal courts
Comments Off on Stakes Go Up In SEC Administrative Proceedings